<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s mine and I will choose what to do with it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tarn.org/2009/06/30/its-mine-and-i-will-choose-what-to-do-with-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2009/06/30/its-mine-and-i-will-choose-what-to-do-with-it/</link>
	<description>Unpicking traditional assumptions about KM and the life of the law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: To be really productive, we need to make friends not appointments &#171; Don&#039;t Compromise!</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2009/06/30/its-mine-and-i-will-choose-what-to-do-with-it/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[To be really productive, we need to make friends not appointments &#171; Don&#039;t Compromise!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 15:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tarn.org/?p=482#comment-1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] But other types of knowledge are not so easily automated. Is our wisdom and our final value as individuals in the workplace ultimately one of those abstract human qualities that lie enigmatically beyond the scope of IT or of quantifying? (It occurs to me that many of the blockbusting sci-fi films that have grabbed our collective attention are technological dystopias: AI; 2001; Terminator; I, Robot – much as we hope technology will solve all our issues, some element of human essence cannot be captured within it. There’s a critical difference between crunching data and interpreting it.) It’s hard to tell whether this acknowledgement that individual human capability may elude our ‘bottling skills’ is an admission of the current frontiers of applied IT, or that current employment practice – that employees no more expect a ‘job for life’ than organisations anticipate offering one – must accept that ‘knowledge’ will move on. Organisations capture what they can before the target moves on. (Our human response to this bottling process and its impact on our relationships with each other raises a whole new host of issues too, as Mark Gould points out in this and many other blog postings.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But other types of knowledge are not so easily automated. Is our wisdom and our final value as individuals in the workplace ultimately one of those abstract human qualities that lie enigmatically beyond the scope of IT or of quantifying? (It occurs to me that many of the blockbusting sci-fi films that have grabbed our collective attention are technological dystopias: AI; 2001; Terminator; I, Robot – much as we hope technology will solve all our issues, some element of human essence cannot be captured within it. There’s a critical difference between crunching data and interpreting it.) It’s hard to tell whether this acknowledgement that individual human capability may elude our ‘bottling skills’ is an admission of the current frontiers of applied IT, or that current employment practice – that employees no more expect a ‘job for life’ than organisations anticipate offering one – must accept that ‘knowledge’ will move on. Organisations capture what they can before the target moves on. (Our human response to this bottling process and its impact on our relationships with each other raises a whole new host of issues too, as Mark Gould points out in this and many other blog postings.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For what it’s worth? … [Guest Article by Robert Terry - ASK Europe] - weknowmore.org</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2009/06/30/its-mine-and-i-will-choose-what-to-do-with-it/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[For what it’s worth? … [Guest Article by Robert Terry - ASK Europe] - weknowmore.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tarn.org/?p=482#comment-652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] But other types of knowledge are not so easily automated. Is our wisdom and our final value as individuals in the workplace ultimately one of those abstract human qualities that lie enigmatically beyond the scope of IT or of quantifying? (It occurs to me that many of the blockbusting sci-fi films that have grabbed our collective attention are technological dystopias: AI; 2001; Terminator; I, Robot – much as we hope technology will solve all our issues, some element of human essence cannot be captured within it. There’s a critical difference between crunching data and interpreting it.) It’s hard to tell whether this acknowledgement that individual human capability may elude our ‘bottling skills’ is an admission of the current frontiers of applied IT, or that current employment practice – that employees no more expect a ‘job for life’ than organisations anticipate offering one – must accept that ‘knowledge’ will move on. Organisations capture what they can before the target moves on. (Our human response to this bottling process and its impact on our relationships with each other raises a whole new host of issues too, as Mark Gould points out in this and many other blog postings.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But other types of knowledge are not so easily automated. Is our wisdom and our final value as individuals in the workplace ultimately one of those abstract human qualities that lie enigmatically beyond the scope of IT or of quantifying? (It occurs to me that many of the blockbusting sci-fi films that have grabbed our collective attention are technological dystopias: AI; 2001; Terminator; I, Robot – much as we hope technology will solve all our issues, some element of human essence cannot be captured within it. There’s a critical difference between crunching data and interpreting it.) It’s hard to tell whether this acknowledgement that individual human capability may elude our ‘bottling skills’ is an admission of the current frontiers of applied IT, or that current employment practice – that employees no more expect a ‘job for life’ than organisations anticipate offering one – must accept that ‘knowledge’ will move on. Organisations capture what they can before the target moves on. (Our human response to this bottling process and its impact on our relationships with each other raises a whole new host of issues too, as Mark Gould points out in this and many other blog postings.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by neilrichards</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2009/06/30/its-mine-and-i-will-choose-what-to-do-with-it/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Twitted by neilrichards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tarn.org/?p=482#comment-503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was Twitted by neilrichards [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by neilrichards [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

