<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some things about KM that we now know are wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/</link>
	<description>Unpicking traditional assumptions about KM and the life of the law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Post-KM : enterprise 2.0, facilitation and complexity :: October :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Post-KM : enterprise 2.0, facilitation and complexity :: October :: 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] are that social networks are engaging, they are an actual tool, rather than a look-up thing, check out my comments on Mark Gould&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are that social networks are engaging, they are an actual tool, rather than a look-up thing, check out my comments on Mark Gould&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Nice post, I agree with most of it. The part of expertise locator&#039;s is understandable from the perspective of traditional Yellow Pages, having employees fill in their profile and keep that uptodate. Which, as you say, not very many employees do. But what is you set up an expertise location system based on peering. We did this in the company I work for. You can find more info here: guruscan.nl. This tool puts social networks and expertise together. And it works: you can easily map the expertise of a company, keep that up to date, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, I agree with most of it. The part of expertise locator&#8217;s is understandable from the perspective of traditional Yellow Pages, having employees fill in their profile and keep that uptodate. Which, as you say, not very many employees do. But what is you set up an expertise location system based on peering. We did this in the company I work for. You can find more info here: guruscan.nl. This tool puts social networks and expertise together. And it works: you can easily map the expertise of a company, keep that up to date, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tropea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Oops, more to add...I&#039;m cutting and pasting from an Internal blog post.

I think my main point was that an expert locater is more like the GAL in Outlook, but a social network is this plus interaction eg. sending messages (similar to email)

That is you use an expert locater occasionally, but you use a social network every day as it&#039;s a read/write tool.

When you are after some help on an issue, or seeking information or a person, you can get around your vertical hierarchy, by blasting a message to your connections. Currently we save time and money from using a “back channel” in getting things done, and networks augment this in an online scenario.
Rather than waiting on your boss, to ask their boss in another office, who has to ask someone else, you can immediately be aware and connect to this person that is usually 3 degree’s or separation apart from you. I’d add to this we are reducing opportunity cost by more accurately hooking up with the best available person for the job at that time, and as a result we create new contacts and relationships.

And then there is the strength of weak ties
http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/faculty_amcafee_v3/the_ties_that_find/
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/mgranovetter/documents/granstrengthweakties.pdf
http://www.annezelenka.com/2007/10/weak-ties-for-social-problem-solving-in-enterprise-20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, more to add&#8230;I&#8217;m cutting and pasting from an Internal blog post.</p>
<p>I think my main point was that an expert locater is more like the GAL in Outlook, but a social network is this plus interaction eg. sending messages (similar to email)</p>
<p>That is you use an expert locater occasionally, but you use a social network every day as it&#8217;s a read/write tool.</p>
<p>When you are after some help on an issue, or seeking information or a person, you can get around your vertical hierarchy, by blasting a message to your connections. Currently we save time and money from using a “back channel” in getting things done, and networks augment this in an online scenario.<br />
Rather than waiting on your boss, to ask their boss in another office, who has to ask someone else, you can immediately be aware and connect to this person that is usually 3 degree’s or separation apart from you. I’d add to this we are reducing opportunity cost by more accurately hooking up with the best available person for the job at that time, and as a result we create new contacts and relationships.</p>
<p>And then there is the strength of weak ties<br />
<a href="http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/faculty_amcafee_v3/the_ties_that_find/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.hbs.edu/faculty/amcafee/index.php/faculty_amcafee_v3/the_ties_that_find/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/mgranovetter/documents/granstrengthweakties.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/mgranovetter/documents/granstrengthweakties.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.annezelenka.com/2007/10/weak-ties-for-social-problem-solving-in-enterprise-20" rel="nofollow">http://www.annezelenka.com/2007/10/weak-ties-for-social-problem-solving-in-enterprise-20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tropea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-104</guid>
		<description>The main problem we have is expert locators fade away when the data is not current, and the other aspect is they are usually boring to use, that is they are static.

That&#039;s why it&#039;s important for an expert locator to allow you to interact, ie. it enables you to find people and add them as a contact (connection/friend). This way when we visit profiles we can see who these people are connected to, and for personal reasons each person can a mass a list of their contacts.

In this respect it becomes a tool that engages an individual, it becomes your contact list, you can see other people&#039;s contact lists, etc...And as you say, the profile points to their content like blogs, and bookmarks, where in the end you may not need to contact that person as one of their blog posts answered your query.

Now that people have some self-interest to use the tool, they are more prone to keep it updated.

You could also do searches like: show me a list of all the experts in &quot;Excel&quot; from within my network, or from within my network and my friends networks.

What is happening here is that Expert Locators (or even the IM buddy list idea) are becoming Social Networks, so rather than a centralised seek and find database that you use on ocassion, we have a more engaging and personally useful daily tool, where the people create the information and connections from a bottom-up approach (more self-organising), where it does most of the work itself as a collective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main problem we have is expert locators fade away when the data is not current, and the other aspect is they are usually boring to use, that is they are static.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s important for an expert locator to allow you to interact, ie. it enables you to find people and add them as a contact (connection/friend). This way when we visit profiles we can see who these people are connected to, and for personal reasons each person can a mass a list of their contacts.</p>
<p>In this respect it becomes a tool that engages an individual, it becomes your contact list, you can see other people&#8217;s contact lists, etc&#8230;And as you say, the profile points to their content like blogs, and bookmarks, where in the end you may not need to contact that person as one of their blog posts answered your query.</p>
<p>Now that people have some self-interest to use the tool, they are more prone to keep it updated.</p>
<p>You could also do searches like: show me a list of all the experts in &#8220;Excel&#8221; from within my network, or from within my network and my friends networks.</p>
<p>What is happening here is that Expert Locators (or even the IM buddy list idea) are becoming Social Networks, so rather than a centralised seek and find database that you use on ocassion, we have a more engaging and personally useful daily tool, where the people create the information and connections from a bottom-up approach (more self-organising), where it does most of the work itself as a collective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AM Law Tech 2008: IT in the balance &#171; Think Much - by Penny Edwards</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>AM Law Tech 2008: IT in the balance &#171; Think Much - by Penny Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] the static expertise directory and instead pulling information from the user&#8217;s activities, including blog posts, comments, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the static expertise directory and instead pulling information from the user&#8217;s activities, including blog posts, comments, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You can&#8217;t make me do it&#8230; &#171; Enlightened tradition</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>You can&#8217;t make me do it&#8230; &#171; Enlightened tradition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-92</guid>
		<description>[...] October 2008 by Mark Gould    In an earlier post, I wrote briefly about incentives in KM initiatives. In what looks like a response to Dave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 2008 by Mark Gould    In an earlier post, I wrote briefly about incentives in KM initiatives. In what looks like a response to Dave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Price</title>
		<link>http://blog.tarn.org/2008/09/16/some-things-about-km-that-we-now-know-are-wrong/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=83#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Fully utilising the collective expertise of staff in a way that benefits the whole business is certainly challenging, but it is well worth the effort, as the gains to be had from making specialist knowledge widely accessible are simply too great for companies to overlook.

People are too busy to regularly update their profile, and the employees whose expertise is perhaps most valuable (primarily the Partners) are invariably the ones with least time available to commit to such tasks, not to mention having the lowest incentive to do so.

Technology can help businesses automate this process and keep the ‘expertise directory’ up to date.  ‘Expertise Location’ solutions are readily available, but few place the onus on the technology itself to automatically categorise and relevancy rank the firm’s experts in relation to a specific query.  Intelligent expertise location solutions determine this based not only on the information held in HR/personnel systems, but also on the work they have done and the matters they are involved in –  information housed in document management, time and billing and CRM systems.  This approach frees up valuable staff time and enables businesses to collate and present all knowledge – no matter where it lives – in a community-based, easily accessible fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully utilising the collective expertise of staff in a way that benefits the whole business is certainly challenging, but it is well worth the effort, as the gains to be had from making specialist knowledge widely accessible are simply too great for companies to overlook.</p>
<p>People are too busy to regularly update their profile, and the employees whose expertise is perhaps most valuable (primarily the Partners) are invariably the ones with least time available to commit to such tasks, not to mention having the lowest incentive to do so.</p>
<p>Technology can help businesses automate this process and keep the ‘expertise directory’ up to date.  ‘Expertise Location’ solutions are readily available, but few place the onus on the technology itself to automatically categorise and relevancy rank the firm’s experts in relation to a specific query.  Intelligent expertise location solutions determine this based not only on the information held in HR/personnel systems, but also on the work they have done and the matters they are involved in –  information housed in document management, time and billing and CRM systems.  This approach frees up valuable staff time and enables businesses to collate and present all knowledge – no matter where it lives – in a community-based, easily accessible fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
