In an Easter-flavoured post on Language Log, Geoff Pullum summarised the argument that the English language has no future tense.
The claim I’m making is not that reference to future time cannot be made in English; of course it can. And the claim is not that will cannot be thus used: probably over 80 percent of its occurrences [...]
Archive for April 3rd, 2008
Tenses and legal dominance
Posted in Knowledge, Law, Lawyering on 3 April 2008 | No Comments »
My mate, not yours
Posted in Clients, Culture, KM, Tradition on 3 April 2008 | 1 Comment »
In my last post, I said that I wanted to refer constructively to something that Doug Cornelius wrote in his series of blog posts on Household KM. Here it is.
Doug’s posts are an interesting review of the tools available to manage domestic calendars, contacts, libraries and information. I found his take on contact management particularly insightful. As [...]