Comments on: Recognition and understanding http://blog.tarn.org/2008/03/18/recognition-and-understanding/ Unpicking traditional assumptions about KM and the life of the law Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:28:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: roanyong http://blog.tarn.org/2008/03/18/recognition-and-understanding/#comment-243 Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:06:48 +0000 http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-243 Hi Mark,

nice post. I think concentrating on positive side of archetype do not make it a better tool to analyse complex matters such as corporate culture. More info:

http://roanyong.wordpress.com/2009/03/08/why-most-significant-stories-msc-is-better-tool-to-analyse-culture-than-archetypes/

]]> By: Why Most Significant Stories (MSC) is better tool to analyse culture than Archetypes « Roan Yong’s Life Odyssey http://blog.tarn.org/2008/03/18/recognition-and-understanding/#comment-242 Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:02:35 +0000 http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-242 [...] March 8, 2009 by roanyong Dave Snowden needs to play mediator recently, due to argument between Graham durant-law and Patrick Lambe about the usefulness of archetypes. Graham proposed that archetypes don’t matter because they oversimplify complex matters such as corporate culture. While Patrick Lambe viewed archetypes as communication tools and nothing more.  (Note: this is based on my understanding after working with Patrick on KM Masterplan in a public organization).   The latter view seems to be shared by Mark Gould. [...]

]]> By: Graham Durant-Law http://blog.tarn.org/2008/03/18/recognition-and-understanding/#comment-10 Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:40:01 +0000 http://innominate.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-10 Hi Mark.

Thanks for referencing my blog! I think your conclusion is spot on. I intend to reference it in the discussions I am having with Patrick Lambe.

Best Regards
Graham

]]>